Sripathi Mohanasundaram

Hi, I'm Sripathi M.

Data & AI Architect. I build the layer that tells enterprise AI what the data means.

Ten years in engineering, seven in data, the last four at Fractal - enterprise data architecture, governance and data modelling on Azure and Databricks, across supply chain, consumer goods and retail. Today I architect the logistics ontology and the semantic layer beneath it for a Fortune 500 CPG company.

AI is only as reliable as the meaning behind the dataA glossary defines words; an ontology connects things and the rules between themPipelines keep getting cheaper to build. Meaning, governance and design do notA KPI definition that nobody owns is really three definitionsAgreed in a workshop is not the same as matching the data underneath

Ask three teams in a large company for their on-time delivery figure and you get three different answers - each correct by its own definition. People resolve that ambiguity in a meeting. An AI agent cannot: given inconsistent definitions it returns a confident answer that is simply wrong.

Most of my decade has gone into the layers underneath that problem - ETL and dimensional modelling, then lakehouse platforms, then the architecture and governance around them. I led a five-engineer team on a Databricks transportation platform of 300+ production tables. Its metadata-driven Medallion framework meant new source systems arrived as configuration, not as new pipeline code.

I also build AI agents for data engineering workflows - including a voice agent that runs first-round SQL interviews.

My career started in electrical and power-plant engineering. That background still shapes how I think about data: a wrong reading has a real cost.

Platform I led

300+ production tables on a metadata-driven Medallion framework

Team

Five engineers across the transportation data platform

Governance

Every KPI definition reconciled against source data before release

Progression

Two promotions in four years at Fractal

CURRENT WORK

Fractal · Apr 2026 -

Currently

Architect - Data & AI, Ontology & Semantic Layer

For the logistics domain of a Fortune 500 CPG company, I model shipments, loads, carriers and routes as object types with explicit relationships between them - then define business KPIs as governed measures over that model, rather than as concepts sitting alongside it. The semantic layer maps the model onto the physical transportation tables, so one business question resolves to one governed definition.

No definition ships until it has been recomputed from source and tied out against the figure the business already trusts. That reconciliation gate is the part I would defend hardest - it is the difference between a model agreed in a workshop and one that matches the data underneath it.

Ontology
The object and relationship model for the logistics domain
Semantic layer
The mapping from that model onto the physical transportation tables
Governance
Every governed KPI reconciled against source data before release, with a named owner per definition
Consumers
LLM agents and analytics resolve questions against governed concepts instead of raw tables
Stack
Timbr (SQL ontology over Databricks) · Databricks · Azure · PySpark · SQL
Full resume →

PORTFOLIO

github.com/microize

BLOG